Press ReleaseFOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Letter to the Editor–REGARDING: Article dated February 5, 2010 entitled “Brindi the dog saga still not over - judge reserves decision on whether to allow SPCA to euthanize allegedly dangerous dog” Dear Editor: As part of the HRM animal control contract, the SPCA is obligated to house animal control dogs and cats that are retained for court cases. Brindi has become a high profile, long term resident at the SPCA, but remains under the control of HRM. The SPCA is not involved in the determinations made by the court and has no influence on the final decision. Over the course of Brindi’s residence, the SPCA has advocated for and provided for exceptional care. We have kept an open dialogue with HRM regarding Brindi’s health and wellbeing and we have ensured that all of her needs are met, including medical, behavioural and social. This is a very sensitive matter and we have great sympathy for all parties involved. The SPCA is never in favour of euthanasia where a viable alternative exists; however the court will ultimately decide what is right for the community. If the judge rules that Brindi is to be euthanized it will not be carried out by the SPCA, nor will it occur on SPCA property. Kristin William Sentencing Recommendation Submitted to HRM ###
MEDIA CONTACT
ABOUT THE NOVA SCOTIA SPCA |
|
